Market Intelligence Audit

The Brandyard
Market Intelligence Audit

Your market is generating pipeline right now.

Most of it is going to your competitors.

We show you exactly how much. And exactly how to take it back.

The Brandyard Market Intelligence Audit is an 18-section strategic deliverable built on live Google Keyword Planner data, competitive intelligence, and AI answer engine analysis — delivered as a Word document your CMO can present to the board and your content team can execute against the same week.

$3,500 · Delivered in 5 business days · Includes 90-minute strategy review

Book your audit
The Four Numbers That Matter

Every audit opens with four scores. They tell you where you stand before you read a single word of analysis.

Google Visibility Score

Your organic search presence rated 0–100 against your top competitors. Calculated from live Google Keyword Planner data via Paxelo — not estimated, not approximated. The exact search volume, competition, and ranking data your competitors’ agencies cannot access without the same platform.

AI Visibility Score

How often your brand is cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot when buyers ask the questions your products answer. Most industrial B2B companies score below 20 on their first audit. Most of their competitors do too — which means this gap belongs to whoever closes it first.

Pipeline Gap

The annual revenue opportunity currently captured by competitors because you do not rank for the keywords your buyers are searching. Calculated in five steps using your actual search volume data, industry conversion benchmarks, and your average deal value. This is the number that makes the $3,500 audit investment feel like arithmetic.

Authority Score

Your E-E-A-T signal strength — how clearly Google and AI platforms can identify your domain as a genuine expert source for your product category. The score that determines whether your content ranks in two weeks or two years.

What's Inside

All 18 Sections

The full report structure. Every section is mandatory. Nothing is summarized, compressed, or templated.

01

Executive Summary & Investment Case

Three McKinsey hypotheses — Visibility Gap, Authority Gap, and Content-ICP Mismatch — each stated explicitly and resolved by data. The four-metric investment strip. The "why this moment is different" table showing specific market catalysts and the search volume spikes they are generating right now.

02

Market Context

Total addressable market with named research firm sources. CAGR and forecast. How your Google search volume trend data confirms — or contradicts — the macro market narrative.

03

Search Visibility Crisis

Your Visibility Score methodology with component weights. A SERP analysis of your single highest-opportunity keyword — positions 1 through 5, why each outranks you, and the specific gap you can exploit. The cost of invisibility per month, stated in bold, calculated from your actual keyword data.

04

Competitor Intelligence

Keyword portfolio comparison against your top three competitors. Article count by topic. Trade media audit — which publications are the invisible competitors stealing your pipeline. Competitor pricing intelligence and how it shapes your content strategy.

05

Keyword Intelligence

Every seed keyword from your brief, sorted by Paxelo opportunity score. Color-coded by competition level. Commercial intent keywords bolded in cobalt. High E-E-A-T keywords underlined. Every data point traceable to a live Google Keyword Planner API response field.

06

Search Volume Trends

12-month volume history for your top three STAR keywords — raw Google data, not smoothed or estimated. Seasonal pattern analysis. Publish timing rationale tied to actual monthly search volume data.

07

Content Gap Analysis

Three fully specified article opportunities. Each one: buyer intent from live Paxelo data, ICP match, E-E-A-T advantage statement, competitor gap, required citations, Bain results projection, and LinkedIn amplification hook. 200+ words each. Built entirely from live Paxelo keyword brief data.

08

E-E-A-T Authority Assessment

Your current Authority Score by component — Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness. What each of your keywords requires. What credentials you have that satisfy those requirements. What is missing and how long it takes to fix.

09

How Brandyard and Paxelo Change the Outcome

The three-way differentiation: McKinsey analytical rigor, 30 years of domain expertise in your exact buyer ecosystem, and live Paxelo keyword intelligence. Why all three are required simultaneously and why generic agencies can execute on two of three at best.

10

Baseline vs 6-Month Target

Twelve metrics, side by side — where you are today versus where you will be in six months. Every baseline value sourced to Paxelo data or a verifiable reference. Every target derived from the BCG experience curve applied to your specific keyword portfolio.

11

6-Month Content Calendar

18 articles. Every publish date specific. Every article sequenced by BCG growth-share matrix classification — Stars published first, compounding into Cash Cows, building the authority foundation that makes every subsequent article rank faster. ICP tier tagged to every article.

12

Pipeline Gap Calculation

Five steps, fully shown. Conservative assumptions stated. Sensitivity analysis across three scenarios. The number that makes the investment case.

13

Engagement Options

Three paths forward — Paxelo Intelligence Subscription, Brandyard Content Retainer, and Full Partnership — each matched to your team’s capacity and the urgency of your pipeline gap.

14

Ideal Customer Profile Analysis

Three ICP tiers. For each: job title, company profile, Google search behavior cross-referenced to your Paxelo keyword data, LinkedIn behavior, sales cycle stage, primary objection, content format preference, and influence on the purchase decision.

15

Internal Linking Architecture

The pillar-cluster map extracted from your Paxelo keyword briefs. Every article in the 18-article calendar linked into the architecture. Orphan prevention protocol — every article published with at least two internal links pointing to it.

16

Competitive Pricing Intelligence

Competitor pricing models, visible price anchors, and discount signals from public sources. Price sensitivity analysis using your Paxelo search intent data. Content strategy implications — what to publish if you are premium, at parity, or value-positioned.

17

LinkedIn Amplification Strategy

Three-post sequences per content gap item. Post 1: insight hook on publish day. Post 2: debate starter at day 3. Post 3: social proof amplifier at day 7. Personal engagement protocol for converting LinkedIn interactions into pipeline conversations.

18

AI Answer Engine Visibility

Your AI Visibility Score across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot. The citation gap map — color-coded by platform, dollar value assigned to every P1 gap. Entity clarity assessment. 90-day AI visibility improvement roadmap.

Data Integrity

The Data Behind Every Claim

This is not a report built from web crawlers or estimated keyword data.

Every keyword metric in the Brandyard Market Intelligence Audit — search volume, competition level, competition index, search intent, E-E-A-T requirement, opportunity score, and 12-month trend data — comes from live Google Keyword Planner data retrieved through our Paxelo intelligence platform on the day your report is generated.

These are the same numbers a Google Ads campaign manager sees in their dashboard today. Not approximations. Not third-party estimates. Not data that is six months old when you receive it.

That sourcing standard is why the pipeline gap calculation in Section 12 holds up when a VP of Marketing presents it to their CMO. And it is why Brandyard audits produce content calendars that rank — because the strategy is built on what Google actually confirms buyers are searching, not on what a tool estimates they might be.

Analytical Frameworks

The Frameworks Behind the Analysis

Three management consulting frameworks. One integrated analytical structure. McKinsey tells us what questions to ask. BCG tells us how to prioritize. Bain tells us how to measure results. Together they produce an audit a VP of Marketing can walk into a boardroom and defend.

McKinsey & Company

Hypothesis-driven issue tree

McKinsey pioneered the practice of leading with conclusions rather than building to them — a discipline called hypothesis-driven problem solving. Every audit opens with three explicit hypotheses about why you are not capturing the organic and AI search pipeline your market position commands. Each hypothesis is resolved by data before a single recommendation is made. Conclusions come before evidence. Every section leads with the "so what."

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Growth-share matrix applied to your keyword portfolio

BCG developed the growth-share matrix to help corporations decide where to invest — classifying business units as Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, or Dogs. The Brandyard audit applies the same logic to your keyword portfolio. Stars get front-loaded in the content calendar because they compound fastest, Cash Cows sustain volume during the ramp, Question Marks are sequenced last to benefit from accumulated authority. The BCG experience curve quantifies exactly how much faster each subsequent article ranks.

Bain & Company

Results-delivery standard applied to content recommendations

Bain built its reputation on a simple promise: every engagement delivers a measurable result, and every recommendation is traceable to a specific outcome. Every content recommendation in the gap analysis includes a specific measurable outcome, a timeline, and a results projection traceable to your Paxelo opportunity score and Google search volume data. No passive content. No detractor content. Only articles that no competitor can replicate from the same data set.

Ideal Buyer

Who This Is For

The Brandyard Market Intelligence Audit was built for one buyer profile: a VP of Marketing, Director of Marketing, or business owner at a technical B2B company who needs to make a defensible investment case for content marketing to a financially literate executive audience.

If you need to answer "what will this produce and when," this report answers that question with a sourced, quantified, five-step pipeline model before you spend a dollar on content production.

If you need to answer "why are competitors outranking us," this report names them, shows their content, identifies their gaps, and specifies the exact articles that displace them.

If you need to answer "are we visible in AI search," this report scores your brand across four platforms with a structured methodology, assigns a dollar value to every citation gap, and gives you a 90-day roadmap to close it.

Industries Served
  • Semiconductor capital equipment
  • Advanced materials distribution
  • Electronics manufacturing
  • Industrial automation
  • Medical device manufacturing
  • Aerospace electronics
  • EV battery technology
  • Fluid handling systems
  • Precision coating equipment
  • Any technical B2B market where buyers research specifications before contacting a vendor
Investment

$3,500 — Single Engagement

Delivered within 5 business days of receiving your completed client brief. Includes:

  • 18-section Word document (typically 60–80 pages)
  • Four scored metrics on the cover page
  • 18-article 6-month content calendar with specific publish dates
  • 60-prompt AI answer engine audit across 4 platforms
  • Entity clarity assessment and AEO improvement roadmap
  • 90-minute strategy review call with Stephen Sowinski
  • 6-month baseline targets and a scheduled review meeting at month 6
  • All Paxelo keyword data delivered as an appendix for your records

What happens after the audit: The audit stands alone as a strategic deliverable. There is no obligation to engage Brandyard for execution. If you choose to execute with your own team, the 18-article calendar and the Paxelo data appendix give them everything they need.

If you choose to engage Brandyard for execution, three options are available:

Paxelo Intelligence Subscription — $499/month

Your team executes. Paxelo provides the live keyword data, E-E-A-T briefs, and monthly AI visibility monitoring.

Brandyard Content Retainer — $5,500/month

Brandyard executes three fully written 2,000+ word articles per month, each produced from a Paxelo brief, co-authored with your applications engineer, and delivered ready to publish with all metadata and internal linking per the Section 15 architecture.

Full Partnership — custom pricing

The complete 18-article calendar executed by Brandyard, including the Paxelo subscription, GA4 content-to-pipeline attribution configuration, weekly ranking dashboard, quarterly executive reviews with updated scores, and LinkedIn amplification execution.

Methodology

About the Methodology

Stephen Sowinski spent 15 years marketing plasma capital equipment into Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and J&J MedTech. Another 15 years building advanced materials distribution channels into Tesla, GE, GM, Honeywell, and the Fortune 500 industrial supply chain.

He has been in the rooms where these buyers make supplier decisions. He knows what a Tier 1 EV battery manufacturer's process engineer asks before putting a vendor on the shortlist. He knows what a medical device company's validation team needs to see before a new supplier clears a pre-submission review. He knows what "technical authority" looks like to the buyers in your specific market — because he has marketed to them for three decades.

Paxelo tells you what buyers are searching for.
Brandyard tells you what those buyers actually need to hear.

The audit structures the case.
The expertise makes the case worth $3,500.

We do not learn your market. We already know it.

Every audit starts with a conversation.

20-minute discovery call. No commitment required.

We will tell you what we expect to find before you pay for the report.